We Will Never Know !

Was Kurt Vonnegut A 9/11 Truther?
Cult icon was one of Bush administration's fiercest critics

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Thursday, April 12, 2007

Legendary author and cultural icon Kurt Vonnegut sadly died yesterday at the age of 84, seemingly before he was able to go public on his doubts about the official story behind 9/11 and join a cadre of other well-known personalities in lending support to the 9/11 Truth Movement.

Vonnegut had seen Alex Jones' videos about 9/11 and government sponsored terror and asked Alex to send him more, after which Alex Jones received a personalized drawing and a letter back from Kurt and was in the process of trying to set him up for an appearance on his radio show before he became ill.

From all indications and other people Alex Jones had talked to, it seemed clear that Vonnegut was ready to add his name to the growing list of high profile public figures who have risked their reputations to slam the official 9/11 story.

We know that Vonnegut had come into contact with and researched the subject with the aid of Alex Jones' documentary films. He was at least questioning the official 9/11 fable and had begun to look into it more deeply.

What would the effect of Kurt Vonnegut speaking out have been? Unfortunately we may never know, but we hope to get back in touch with his representatives at the appropriate time because it is historically important to record Vonnegut's stance on this issue.

Vonnegut was certainly clued in to the fact that the political process in America is completely bought and paid for. In his final book, A Man Without a Country, Vonnegut noted that "no matter which one wins, we will have a Skull and Bones President," referring to the 2004 "election" between Bush and Kerry.

In his final major speech at the Ohio State University just over a year ago, Vonnegut offered further insights on the Bush presidency, clarifying the fact that "The only difference between Bush and Hitler is that Hitler was elected."

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9/11 Hero William Rodriguez Tells His Story!
In this powerful and emotional DVD, produced by William Rodriguez himself, the 9/11 hero presents his incredible story of bravery and the subsequent honors and accolades he turned his back on in his search for the real truth of what happened that fateful day. Click here to buy the DVD or click here to subscribe to Prison Planet.tv and watch it online now in high quality!
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

"You all know, of course, that the election was stolen. Right here,” Vonnegut told the audience.

Vonnegut was no stranger to the methods of dictators, he fought in World War 2 and was captured by German soldiers in Dresden in December 1944. The Nazis put Vonnegut to work collecting bodies for mass burial but there were too many corpses to bury so the Nazis simply sent in men with flamethrowers and burned the remains to ashes. Vonnegut was imprisoned in an underground meatpacking cellar known as Slaughterhouse Five, which later became the title of perhaps his most popular book.

The personalized drawing Kurt Vonnegut sent Alex Jones (click for enlargement).

Vonnegut was one of the Bush administration's harshest critics in his final years, using his razor sharp words to regularly slam the war in Iraq through his In These Times column.

"By saying that our leaders are power-drunk chimpanzees, am I in danger of wrecking the morale of our soldiers fighting and dying in the Middle East?" he wrote. "Their morale, like so many bodies, is already shot to pieces. They are being treated, as I never was, like toys a rich kid got for Christmas in December."

Vermont Calls for Impeachment

Published on Friday, April 20, 2007 by Associated Press

Vermont Senate Calls
for
Bush, Cheney Impeachment
Associated Press staff

MONTPELIER, Vt. - Vermont senators voted Friday to call for the impeachment of President Bush and Vice President Dick Cheney, saying their actions have raised “serious questions of constitutionality.”The non-binding resolution was approved 16-9 without debate - all six Republicans in the chamber at the time and three Democrats voted against it.

The resolution says Bush and Cheney’s actions in the U.S. and abroad, including in Iraq, “raise serious questions of constitutionality, statutory legality, and abuse of the public trust.”

“I think it’s going to have a tremendous political effect, a tremendous political effect on public discourse about what to do about this president,” said James Leas, a vocal advocate of withdrawing troops from Iraq and impeaching Bush and Cheney.

Vermont lawmakers earlier voted to demand an immediate troop withdrawal from Iraq in another non-binding resolution.
Democratic House Speaker Gaye Symington has kept a similar resolution from reaching the floor in her chamber. She argued that an impeachment resolution would be partisan and divisive and that it would distract Washington from efforts to get the United States out of Iraq, which she says is more important.
In the Senate, Republican Lt. Gov. Brian Dubie had opposed the resolution, but he was absent Friday. That left Democratic Senate President Pro Tem Peter Shumlin in charge, and he immediately took up the measure.
Forty towns voted in favor of similar non-binding impeachment resolutions at their annual town meetings in March. State lawmakers in Wisconsin

The Teflon Administration

This Administration has acted out with impunity and orchestrated The second worst Record of non-accomplishments since Gw's first four years.The difference between his two terms is that ; at the time of this posting, Life for the NotRich American folks has become Harder and still more Challenging than before GW took office. Well, I still believe in miricals. Whether or not you do or does it really come into play when I think, " If Nixon was a thread away from impeacement then maybe there's still a probability of having some justice nomatter where the criminals come from ? Hmmm...Even "Teflon" wears out with enough use of it. And we all know this teflon has been hot a long time now. Hope,Pray,do whatever it is you do when you want something badly enough!! Peace & Participate, Neo
Enjoy the following Good News

Published on Friday, April 20, 2007 by Atlantic Free Press
Kucinich to Sponsor Impeach Cheney Bill
by Dave Lindorff

Sources close to the office of Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-Ohio) confirm that the progressive Democratic congressman and Democratic presidential aspirant intends to introduce a bill of impeachment against Vice President Dick Cheney in the House of Representatives on Wednesday, April 25. The move will mark the second time that an impeachment bill has been submitted against a member of the Bush administration. Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-GA) filed a bill of impeachment against President Bush in December of last year, just as the 109th Congress was about to end, and as Rep. McKenney was about to leave office (she was defeated in last November’s election).

Kucinich’s bill will go to the Judiciary Committee, where Chairman John Conyers (D-MI) and the other members will have to decide whether to request subpoena powers and to begin a hearing into impeachable offenses by the vice president.
Kucinich’s action marks a major step forward for impeachment activists, who have been frustrated by House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-CA), who has repeatedly stated that she has no interest in having the House hold impeachment hearings against president or vice president (and who has been leaning hard on Democratic caucus members in the House not to file impeachment bills).

By bucking Pelosi and filing his bill, Kucinich may force the mainstream corporate media to start discussing the idea. There has been a virtual blackout on impeachment in the media, which has not even been asking the question in polls, since a year ago, when Pelosi made it clear she had no interest in impeachment.

Kucinich’s move comes as citizens across the country are bringing impeachment resolutions to town meetings, city councils, Democratic Party county and state committees, and even state legislatures–and getting them passed.

The Democratic Party Establishment has been resisting impeachment, fearing that it could “turn off” independent voters, although the few polls that have been conducted suggest that a majority of Americans, and even not a few Republicans, favor impeaching the president. But as the administration’s scandals have grown in number and seriousness, from financial chicanery to voter suppression to political firings of federal prosecutors to illegal spying on citizens, and as the president’s War in Iraq has lurched from bad to catastrophic, public pressure is mounting for Democrats to take tougher action.

Kucinich’s bill may not in itself put Bush’s impeachment back on the Congressional table, but it could whet the public’s appetite for more substantial fare.

Immigration Law As Intended in 1952

Amended By Neo

July 4, 2007

Laws are always well intended! We, "The Common American Citizens" have been duped into reacting with prejudice against "Each Other, Re:The Illegals and The Amnesty Legislation" . None of this would happening if The President didn't want it to. By avoiding it and going on with his Own Agenda, namely The Colonization Policy ( The War) and that also includes Mexico and Canada and making both borders with its own super Highway From Mexico, across and through the USA and into Canada. Deliberate avoidance of Upholding The Immigration Laws of the McCarran-Walter Act or the Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) of 1952.

The INA relied on a national origins quota system with a preference system for Eastern Hemisphere immigrants, and was concerned with excluding and removing subversives and communists. Since the INA, amendments have been added and the law changed in an apparent attempt to solve the illegal alien problem. This discussion does not attempt to analyze each amendment or law in any detail. The main issue is the apparent consequences of all the legislation. After INA, the Immigration Act of 1965 repealed the national origins quota system and all nations were given an equal chance to immigrate to the United States. Immigration Commissioners come and go with each Administration, but the only consistent pattern that has emerged since the 1970s is that the illegal alien population is growing at a rapid pace.

The Immigration Reform and Control Act (IRCA) of 1986 was signed into law by President Reagan and included amnesty for aliens who could establish residence in the United States since January 1, 1982, employer sanctions aimed at removing the lure of employment, and a special exemption for aliens employed in agricultural work. The Triennial Comprehensive Report on Immigration (USINS, 1999) showed that 2.7 million person gained lawful permanent residence as a direct result of IRCA. Although the Immigration Act of 1990 (IMMACT90) that took effect in 1992, more than doubled the number of visas available to persons who qualified for employment-based immigration, it also attempted to begin removing aliens with aggravated felony convictions. This focus on removing criminal aliens continued with the addition of the Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act (IIRIRA) that attempted to apply retroactivity to aggravated alien felons in the United States. In addition to adding Border Patrol agents (5000) and interior enforcement agents (300) over several years, the IIRIRA also expedited removals of certain excludable aliens applying for admission into the United States. Needless to say, the various amendments are under continuous judicial review and this tends to neutralize the intent of the laws.