Wednesday, October 10, 2007

Much Ado 'Bout Nothing

The Washington Post Published A News Piece Yesterday With The Following HeadLine.

Published on Monday, October 8, 2007 by the Washington Post    by Dan Balz

"Clinton’s Iran Vote Prompts A Harsh Back-and-Forth"

The Article had less dramatic news then The headline Suggest. In fact , if you were scanning The Headlines for what to read next ect, You just might get the impression That the The Rock, Mrs. Hillary Clinton Had Somehow Stirred the flames underneath the already Tence Feelings between Iran and President Bush, who Speaks For,in Effect, The Whole of All Americans.

Now, I'm not a big " Anybody's Fan", But after reading The short artical, I had to say "Good for you Hillary" For telling us exactly what the Bill in Question was and then how the amended version was very moderate in tone and Diplomacy With tact ! 

Here it is >>

Clinton’s Iran Vote Prompts A Harsh Back-and-Forth

by Dan Balz

NEW HAMPTON, Iowa - Randall Rolph said he came to New Hampton, Iowa, on Sunday to see Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.) with an open mind about whether to support her candidacy. After a tough exchange over Iran, he left saying he had ruled her out. 1008 05

                      Randall Rolph was one of several hundred people who turned out in this small town  in northern Iowa for Clinton’s appearance. When she called on him for a question, he pulled out a piece of paper and read a question about Iran.

Rolph asked Clinton to explain her Senate vote Wednesday for a resolution urging the Bush administration to label the Iranian Revolutionary Guard Corps a terrorist organization. Rolph interpreted that measure as giving Bush authority to use military action against the Iranians.

“Well, let me thank you for the question, but let me tell you that the premise of the question is wrong and I’ll be happy to explain that to you,” Clinton began.

She offered a detailed description of the resolution, which she said stressed robust diplomacy that could lead to imposing sanctions against Iran, and then pointedly said to Rolph that her view wasn’t in “what you read to me, that somebody obviously sent to you.”Continued

No comments:

Blog Archive